Xenophobia, Nationalism, and War
The collapse of an empire can result in the division of families and the redrawing of geographical boundaries. New leaders promise the return of people and territories that may have been lost in the past, often advocating aggressive foreign policies that can result in costly and devastating wars. The final years of the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires, the end of European colonization in Africa and Asia, and the demise of the Soviet Union were all accompanied by war and atrocity.
These efforts to reunite lost kin are known as irredentism territorial claims based on shared ethnic ties made by one state to a minority population residing within another state. For Kin or Country explores this phenomenon, investigating why the collapse of communism prompted more violence in some instances and less violence in others. Despite the tremendous political and economic difficulties facing all former communist states during their transition to a market democracy, only Armenia, Croatia, and Serbia tried to upset existing boundaries. Hungary, Romania, and Russia practiced much more restraint.
The authors examine various explanations for the causes of irredentism and for the pursuit of less antagonistic policies, including the efforts by Western Europe to tame Eastern Europe. Ultimately, the authors find that internal forces drive irredentist policy even at the risk of a country's self-destruction and that xenophobia may have actually worked to stabilize many postcommunist states in Eastern Europe.
Events in Russia and Eastern Europe in 2014 have again brought irredentism into the headlines. In a new Introduction, the authors address some of the events and dynamics that have developed since the original version of the book was published. By focusing on how nationalist identity interact with the interests of politicians, For Kin or Country explains why some states engage in aggressive irredentism and when others forgo those opportunities that is as relevant to Russia and Ukraine in 2014 as it was for Serbia, Croatia, and Armenia in the 1990s.
"[For Kin or Country] deserves to be on the bookshelf of every serious scholar of nationalism and ethnic conflict." — Eric Kaufmann, Nations and Nationalism
"Sophisticated and accessible.... [Saideman & Ayres] bring a wealth of academic knowledge and policy experience to bear on a timely and important topic." — Sheila Croucher, International Studies Review
"An excellent review of propositions on irredentism." — Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, Journal of Peace Research
"The most comprehensive and nuanced account to date of irredentism.... A useful reference and an important touchstone for comparative politics and international relations scholars interested in irredentism, secessionism, and kin-state nationalism." — Myra A. Waterbury, Nationalities Papers
"For Kin or Country is a breakthrough in the study of ethnic conflict. It provides both rigorous theory and testing with regard to irredentism and reaches a compelling conclusion about the primacy of domestic politics. The book features a sophisticated interplay among identity, xenophobia, and kin status as it successfully accounts for variation in irredentism in recent decades-from absence to near obsession-throughout Eastern Europe. The framework developed explains superficially puzzling cases such as the restraint shown by Hungary and the intense efforts at retrieval from Armenia. This work sets a high standard for the study of ethnic conflict in general and irredentism in particular, and I recommend the book without reservation to both specialists in the area and those with a more general interest in international relations and comparative politics." — Patrick James, professor and director, Center for International Studies, University of Southern California, and vice-president, International Studies Association
"In this important book, Stephen M. Saideman and R. William Ayres correct a lot of nonsense that has been written and said not just about irredentism, but about nationalism and foreign policy. They emphasize the limits to even great powers' ability to influence the choices of other countries, urging humility in the degree to which threats or proffered benefits can change minds. Power, Saideman and Ayres find, may not prevent the efforts of the determined, or motivate the ambivalent. The authors also emphasize the importance of understanding other people's beliefs, especially the content of their nationalist ideology, instead of assuming likely behavior can be guessed from labels such as 'nationalist' or 'extremist.' The paradoxical conclusion is that irredentism may be restrained more by xenophobia than by international pressure. All told, this book is an important contribution to the literatures on identity, nationalism, and foreign policy, and will be profitably read by anyone looking for insight into the tangled nationalist politics of Europe's unsettled east." — Stuart J. Kaufman, professor of political science and international relations, University of Delaware
List of Tables and Figures
1. Irredentism and Its Absence: International Presures Versus Domestic Dynamics
2. Dueling Irredentisms: Greater Croatia and Greater Serbia
3. Reunification at Any Price: Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh
4. Pushing the Envelope: Hungary's Assertive Attention to Kin
5. Romania's Restraint? Avoiding the Worst Through Domestic Scapegoating
6. Breaking up Is Hard to Do: Russia and Its Kin in the Near Abroad
7. War and Peace in Eastern Europe, the Former Soviet Union, and Beyond
8. Findings and Implications