The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict
For more than a century, from 1900 to 2006, campaigns of nonviolent resistance were more than twice as effective as their violent counterparts in achieving their stated goals. By attracting impressive support from citizens, whose activism takes the form of protests, boycotts, civil disobedience, and other forms of nonviolent noncooperation, these efforts help separate regimes from their main sources of power and produce remarkable results, even in Iran, Burma, the Philippines, and the Palestinian Territories.
Combining statistical analysis with case studies of specific countries and territories, Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan detail the factors enabling such campaigns to succeed and, sometimes, causing them to fail. They find that nonviolent resistance presents fewer obstacles to moral and physical involvement and commitment, and that higher levels of participation contribute to enhanced resilience, greater opportunities for tactical innovation and civic disruption (and therefore less incentive for a regime to maintain its status quo), and shifts in loyalty among opponents' erstwhile supporters, including members of the military establishment.
Chenoweth and Stephan conclude that successful nonviolent resistance ushers in more durable and internally peaceful democracies, which are less likely to regress into civil war. Presenting a rich, evidentiary argument, they originally and systematically compare violent and nonviolent outcomes in different historical periods and geographical contexts, debunking the myth that violence occurs because of structural and environmental factors and that it is necessary to achieve certain political goals. Instead, the authors discover, violent insurgency is rarely justifiable on strategic grounds.
This is the first major scholarly book to make a well-supported argument that, contrary to what many people believe, nonviolent resistance is more effective than armed resistance in overthrowing regimes, an advantage that is maintained even when the target is not democratic.
Robert Jervis, Columbia University
Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan offer a fresh, lively, and penetrating analysis of the conditions under which nonviolent resistance succeeds or fails. Using a wealth of data and in-depth case studies, they show that the scholarly emphasis on forceful approaches is misguided: nonviolent movements are often better able to mobilize supporters, resist regime crackdowns, develop innovative resistant techniques, and otherwise take on and defeat repressive regimes and build durable democracies.
Daniel Byman, Georgetown University and senior fellow, Saban Center at the Brookings Institution
After the breathtaking events of 2011, can anyone doubt that nonviolent civil resistance is an effective tool for political change? In this provocative, well-written, and compelling book, Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan demonstrate that nonviolent civil resistance is usually a better way to force political change. They identify the conditions favoring its success and provide a convincing explanation for why nonviolent resistance is so effective. Their analysis is rigorous yet accessible, and their conclusions have profound implications for anyone seeking to understandߜor promoteߜfar-reaching social and political reform.
Stephen Walt, Harvard University
This is social science at its best. Years of critical study culminate in a book on one dominating issue: how does nonviolent opposition compare with violence in removing a regime or achieving secession? The authors study successes and failures and alternative diagnoses of success and failure, reaching a balanced judgment meriting careful study.
Thomas C. Schelling, Harvard University, recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics
All of us dedicated to peaceful protest as a way to change the world can take heart from this book.
The work belongs in all academic libraries.... Highly recommended.
Well researched, skillfully written, insightful, and timely.
Joseph G. Bock
List of IllustrationsList of TablesAcknowledgmentsPart I. Why Civil Resistance Works1. The Success of Nonviolent Resistance Campaigns2. The Primacy of Particpation in Nonviolent Resistance3. Exploring Alternative Explanations for the Success of Civil ResistancePart II. Case StudiesIntroduction to the Case Studies4. The Iranian Revolution, 1977ߛ19795. The First Palestinian Intifada, 1987ߛ19926. The Philippine People Power Movement, 1983ߛ19867. Why Civil Resistance Sometimes Fails: The Burmese Uprising, 1988ߛ1990Case Study SummaryPart III. The Implications of Civil Resistance8. After the Campaign: The Consequences of Violent and Nonviolent Resistance9. ConclusionEpilogueAppendixNotesReferencesIndex
Read an excerpt from the chapter, >The Success of Nonviolent Resistance Campaigns.
Winner of the 2012 Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award from the American Political Science Association
Winner of the 2013 University of Louisville Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order